Edited by Rachel Woodward
Chapter 13: Confounding restoration: environmental politics and ecology in militarized landscapes
Many militarized landscapes pose particular challenges as sites of ecological restoration, due to their complex characteristics and distinctive forms of contamination. Military training, testing, research, and warfare have created many of the world’s most toxic or hazardous sites, but paradoxically in some cases have also created valuable habitats. The politics and goals of military land restoration are complex. Restoration seeks to erase ecological damage and military hazards but may simultaneously need to avoid the erasure of social and historical meaning. Restoration efforts may also serve differently to exacerbate or mitigate social justice, institutional inequities, and the degree to which the military is held accountable for its social and environmental impacts. Using examples from the United States, central Europe, and Korea, the chapter explores these tensions of erasure, commemoration, accountability, and equity in the context of transitioning militarized landscapes. In these examples, the physical condition of the land, its uses, and the discursive framing of militarization itself remain contested and unstable.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.