Credit, Money and Crises in Post-Keynesian Economics
Show Less

Credit, Money and Crises in Post-Keynesian Economics

Edited by Louis-Philippe Rochon and Hassan Bougrine

In this volume, Louis-Philippe Rochon and Hassan Bougrine bring together key post-Keynesian voices in an effort to push the boundaries of our understanding of banks, central banking, monetary policy and endogenous money. Issues such as interest rates, income distribution, stagnation and crises – both theoretical and empirical – are woven together and analysed by the many contributors to shed new light on them. The result is an alternative analysis of contemporary monetary economies, and the policies that are so needed to address the problems of today.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Two easy pieces

Riccardo Bellofiore


My path into heretical thinking in monetary macroeconomics has been deeply influenced by Marc Lavoie and Mario Seccareccia. The intellectual link was, of course, Augusto Graziani, whose evolution I began to follow closely since my first years of study and research. In my experience, since 1977 (if not even before) to read Graziani was to be introduced to his version of the theory of the monetary circuit. I was part of the ‘heroic’ early years of the Italian approach to the monetary circuit, mostly represented by the Seminar in Naples about Monetary Theory (1981–1985). This meant a confrontation and dialogue with the other French versions, the one held by Alain Parguez and the quite different one by Bernard Schmitt. In 1982 there was also a confrontation in Nice, with a group around Richard Arena (and to which Jan Kregel participated). It is against this background that my encounter with Marc and Mario returns in my recollections. I think I met Marc for the first time in Louvain-la-Neuve, in 1985, thanks to some initiative (I was there as a visiting professor) promoted by Michel de Vroey who, at the time, was involved in a difficult intellectual trajectory trying to find a bridge from Marx to monetary heterodoxies, involving also Aglietta, and Benetti and Cartelier. I confess I remained stuck there, at the meeting between Marx and Keynes, and Schumpeter too: I am definitely a slow learner, while Michel is nowadays very far away from that. I asked Lavoie for a survey of the theory of the monetary circuit, which was likely the first of its kind in print, in a special section on money edited by me, for an Italian theoretical journal, Metamorfosi (Lavoie, 1987a). The original French version appeared the same year in Monnaie et Production, the special series that Alain edited for Economies et Societies for many happy years (Lavoie, 1987b).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.