Money, Method and Contemporary Post-Keynesian Economics
Show Less

Money, Method and Contemporary Post-Keynesian Economics

Edited by Sheila Dow, Jesper Jespersen and Geoff Tily

This volume concentrates on contemporary Post-Keynesian contributions in money, method and economic policy. Post-Keynesian economics shares with Keynes the ambition of understanding the economy as a whole and as an integrated part of society. The book begins by analysing money, banks and finance as dynamic phenomena, followed by chapters focusing on methodological themes such as uncertainty, longer-term issues, sustainability and other non-monetary economic activities.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: A personal interpretation of Victoria Chick’s monetary thought: intellectual rigour, scientific innovation and common sense

Carlos J. Rodríguez-Fuentes


This chapter offers a personal interpretation of Victoria Chick’s monetary thought which is heavily drawn on two basic principles that have always been present in her work and should be known by every economist who really wants to understand the complex influence that theory, method and institutional context exert on the way monetary policy works. The two basic principles I want to address in my review of Victoria Chick’s monetary thought are these: 1. the notion that monetary change is only ‘one half of the story’ in our understanding of the way the economic system really works; and that 2. the development, structure and evolution of the banking system matters for the way monetary policy works and banking system promotes (or does not) economic development. Our analysis will suggest that the two aforementioned principles are part of the innovative academic legacy of Victoria Chick, which has resulted from her constant dedication to the critical analysis of theory and her strong determination to unravel the assumptions and logical foundations of theories. The analysis provided in this chapter will suggest that the explicit consideration of these two principles, namely, the way money enters the income-generating process and the historical and institutional particularities of theory, become crucial not only for a better knowledge of the way a monetary economy works, but also for understanding the evolving character of the so-called ‘monetary transmission mechanism’. In my opinion, the explicit consideration of these two principles would particularly help many conventional economists to overcome their current discomfort and desperation, for conventional monetary theory helps very little to understand the current debate over the broken transmission mechanism of monetary policy or the ineffectiveness of its conventional tools. Victoria Chick’s monetary thought explains not only the potential interrelationship of monetary and fiscal policy, for this depends on the way the monetary change takes place, but also the ‘abnormal’ time of monetary policy (Roubini 2016) that orthodox economists are unable to explain, for their conceptual framework does not conceive what Victoria Chick takes for granted: that the effect of any monetary change depends on how people behave, who issues the money and in exchange for what (Chick 1978b, pp. 55–8).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.