Edited by Stephan W. Schill, Christian J. Tams and Rainer Hofmann
Chapter 3: The first investor-state arbitration? The Suez Canal dispute of 1864 and some reflections on the historiography of international investment law
The use of history in international investment law (IIL) scholarship is a work in progress. IIL scholarship already relies on history to a significant extent, but IIL scholarship can also ‘do’ history better than it currently does. IIL scholarship’s use of history sometimes seems methodologically unselfconscious and incomplete. To improve, historically minded IIL scholars need to have a better sense of the issues, both epistemological and practical, that professional historians wrestle with, and they need to be more comfortable engaging in the sine qua non of the modern historical method – the use of primary-source (and typically archival) materials to illuminate both how IIL was understood and experienced in earlier eras and how those earlier conceptions and applications of IIL may or may not remain relevant today.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.