Edited by Stephan W. Schill, Christian J. Tams and Rainer Hofmann
Chapter 7: Resolving challenges to historical research: Developing a project to define fair and equitable treatment
This book chapter presents three methodological challenges stemming from archival research. The chapter reflects upon these challenges and provides solutions based upon personal experiences with legal historical analysis into the ‘fair and equitable treatment’ (FET) clause, found today in most international investment agreements. The chapter proceeds in four parts. Part one discusses the first challenge, which refers to whether historical research can or should be divided into explicit time periods, also known as periodization. Part two examines the second challenge: defining the subject matter of the historical research, and deciding whether international legal history should exclusively focus on law by studying the history of rules and concepts, or whether to look at law in context, studying its practice, and at how legal institutions work. Part three examines the issue of anachronism in legal historical methodology, meaning whether to read the past with knowledge of the present. Part four concludes.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.