Chapter 2: Aristotle as natural law theorist
George Duke’s chapter examines the question of whether Aristotle is properly regarded as a natural law theorist. He discusses three claims about law historically associated with the natural law tradition: the existence and content of law depends on a divine normative foundation; the existence and content of law depends on a natural normative foundation; and the existence and content of law depends on a rational normative foundation. Duke provides a detailed and nuanced discussion of whether Aristotle should be understood as endorsing any of these propositions. He concludes that, while Aristotle does not endorse the first claim, he does endorse the second and third claims (albeit in a qualified sense).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.