Edited by Jonathan Wilkenfeld, Kyle Beardsley and David Quinn
Chapter 4: Preaching what we practice: defining gray zone challenges for policy makers and academics
In this chapter, the author defends the policy and scholarly utility of two terms that have emerged from policy discourse—“gray zone” and “gray zone challenges”—when these terms are wellspecified. Conceding that the terms are extremely heterogeneous in how they currently categorize events, he distills the gray zone down to two common elements: actions that have harmful intent and play within a spectrum between war and peace brought into being by normative violations. The gray zone is explicitly depicted as a literal spectrum between ordinary competition and international crisis. Using the methodology of pragmatism and the lessons of the “practice turn,” the chapter leverages this specification of the gray zone to specify a canonical preliminary case universe and intervention in international relations research programs that have security policy implications for things like maritime disputes, interstate mediation, and international law.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.