Edited by Peter Mankowski
This chapter addresses the interface between the Brussels Ibis regime and intellectual property (IP). By going through selected jurisdiction and enforcement provisions, it provides an overview of the European civil procedural framework within which IP litigation operates. The chapter gives a nuanced assessment of the Regulation’s suitability for IP disputes: in spite of the general nature of the Brussels Ibis Regulation jurisdiction rules, it is argued that the Regulation provides appropriate solutions for the special field of IP litigation. In some cases, however, an IP-specific interpretation of general rules (such as tort jurisdiction) is required. Although the Regulation’s rules of jurisdiction seem to be a better fit for unregistered than registered rights, the problems that arise for registered rights are mainly caused by the unfortunate GAT/LuK judgment and its adoption in Article 24(4) Brussels Ibis. Set in this context, future directions for improving crossborder IP litigation, stimulated for example through the Hague Judgments Convention (HJC), are discussed
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.