Between Legal Assertions and Utopian Aspirations
Edited by Peter Hilpold
Chapter 4: Self-determination and secession: similarities and differences
Dealing shortly with some general questions of self-determination, the chapter concentrates on the comparison between secessionist claims and reactions of central authorities and the so-called world community to them in states that belong to the category of post-modernist states (e.g., the United Kingdom vis-à-vis Scotland, Canada vis-à-vis Quebec) and modern or pre-modern states (e.g., Ukraine vis-à-vis Eastern Ukraine or the Crimea). One of his conclusions is that the more reasons a minority may have to break away, the more difficult it usually is; both for internal and external reasons (e.g., the Kurds in some Middle Eastern countries). And on the contrary, the lesser the need, the easier it may be (the Quebecois in Canada). The chapter also analyses the reasons (mostly political while legal arguments serve to cover political considerations) why the world community, or parts of it, supports independence claims of some groups (e.g., the Kosovars), while being vehemently against other groups (e.g., the Crimeans).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.