Edited by Rex Ahdar
Chapter 10: Liberal constitutionalism and the unsettling of the secular
This chapter argues that certain features of our constitutional theories and practices have been more dependent than we have heretofore acknowledged on an implicit faith in the character and success of secularism. An assumption about the ‘secular’ nature of the social world has lent certain resources to liberal constitutional theory and made possible particular ideas about the nature of contemporary constitutionalism. Yet the conviction that our political and social lives can be satisfyingly described as secular has been seriously destabilized by experience and theory alike. A simple faith in secularism thus unsettled, certain gaps or shortcomings in prevailing accounts of liberal constitutionalism are exposed. This chapter explores how this unsettling of secularism troubles claims about the centrality of proportionality analysis and rights constitutionalism in constitutional thought and practice, and ultimately raises questions about the ground for legitimacy and role of sovereignty in modern constitutionalism.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.