Edited by Rex Ahdar
Chapter 13: When judges are theologians: adjudicating religious questions
This chapter explores how US courts address legal disputes that implicate contested religious or theological questions. While American law’s ostensibly straightforward answer to this question is simply that the Constitution prohibits courts from adjudicating religious questions, the reality is far more complicated. The legal consequences of applying this religious question doctrine vary depending on the context and may therefore encourage different context-sensitive strategies and outcomes. Thus, when judges dismiss private law cases that implicate theological questions, they often leave aggrieved parties without a remedy for legal wrongs; when judges dismiss public law cases that include theological questions, they often leave some sphere of human conduct beyond the law’s regulatory reach. Contrary to the prevailing doctrine, the different jurisprudential considerations raised by these disparate practical consequences justify affording courts more flexibility in the private law context to resolve disputes that implicate theological claims.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.