Edited by Steven C. Roach
Chapter 2: Opening up international relations, or: how I learned to stop worrying and love non-Western IR
This chapter addresses the unmet goals of opening up IR. It argues that defined only in terms of geographical locatedness, debates about and efforts toward opening up IR has met a dead end. Come the 2000s, students of IR increasingly realized that the issue is not only about ‘who does the theorising?’ but also what they say. And, what they say (be they from inside or outside North American and Western Europe, the mainstream or the critical fringes of IR) may be characterized by Eurocentric takes on the international. The chapter distinguishes between two ways of responding to the challenge of Eurocentrism in IR: one that has affinities with critical theory and one that does not. It begins with ‘non-Western IR’, suggesting that the project occludes the very avenues it is supposed to open. The chapter then highlights how the study of ‘constitutive outside’ offers a method of inquiry into the international that is sensitive to the ‘geopolitics of knowledge’.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.