Research Handbook on Law and Courts
Show Less

Research Handbook on Law and Courts

Edited by Susan M. Sterett and Lee D. Walker

The Research Handbook on Law and Courts provides a systematic analysis of new work on courts as governing institutions. Authors consider how courts have taken on regulating fundamental categories of inclusion and exclusion, including citizenship rights. Courts’ centrality to governance is addressed in sections on judicial processes, sub-national courts, and political accountability, all analyzed in multiple legal/political systems. Other chapters turn to analyzing the worldwide push for diversity in staffing courts. Finally, the digitization of records changes both court processes and studying courts. Authors included in the Handbook discuss theoretical, empirical and methodological approaches to studying courts as governing institutions. They also identify promising areas of future research.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: The use of precedent in US Supreme Court litigant briefs

Jessica A. Schoenherr and Ryan C. Black


A Supreme Court merits brief serves an informational purpose, supplying the justices with a case’s history, legal arguments, and proposed resolution. While providing this information, however, attorneys use their discretion over the briefs’ language to turn these documents into carefully constructed documents of persuasion. Attorneys use the briefs to define the issues on which the Court will decide the case, frame the justices’ perception of it and make arguments designed to help win the case. In a common law system like the United States, where legal precedents are the primary legal building blocks, these early decisions by attorneys can influence the Court's eventual decisions. While many studies examine how Supreme Court opinions expand or restrict the scope of existing law, no such analysis—so far as we know—takes up how litigants themselves present these arguments to the Court in the written brief. This is important because existing norms prevent the Court from addressing issues and topics not formally presented to it by the litigants. In this chapter, we provide an initial look at the use of legal authority in litigant briefs. Using data collected from a random sample of Establishment Clause cases, we compare human and computer-based approaches for identifying both when precedent is used and, more importantly, how it is used by a litigant. We also examine the determinants of whether the Court ultimately follows the arguments offered by a brief.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.