Edited by Susan M. Sterett and Lee D. Walker
Chapter 16: Judicial diversity in the United States federal judiciary
This chapter examines the importance of diversity and representation in the judicial branch in terms of both race and gender. This piece operates on the belief that judicial institutions aspire to be representative bodies and thus who sits on the bench largely influences policymaking and social change. By focusing on the intersection of race and gender, this chapter seeks to better understand intragroup difference and the position of these groups, particularly for women of color. The authors make the case that judicial biographies and opinions are key documents in understanding judicial behavior as one’s life experience shapes their worldview and their decisions. In taking seriously the relevance of such documents, this chapter undertakes a close reading of the written opinions in the US Supreme Court case Utah v. Strieff (2016). Through a close reading, the authors note the differences between US Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Clarence Thomas to gain more insight on how both race and gender shape their thinking. In understanding and unmasking these differences, the chapter emphasizes the importance of comprehending the position of judges based on their identity, specifically race and gender, in order to understand the impact that identity has within the judicial branch.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.