Edited by Susan M. Sterett and Lee D. Walker
Chapter 22: When do the losers win? Appellate court reversals of civil jury verdicts
Negligence cases are the daily business of many courts, but seldom the subject matter used to assess theories of legal mobilization and decision making. Popular images of jury verdicts contribute to the idea that in the United States, the legal system awards people who complain, whether they merit an award or not. Yet if people are aware of what courts do before they take cases, complainants only ought to win about 50 percent of the time, as economists have argued. Furthermore, systematic advantages accrue to those more experienced in the legal system, and judges supervise what trial courts and juries have awarded. This chapter finds that, indeed, defendants who lose appeal more often than plaintiffs, and courts of appeal are more likely to rule in favor of defendants who appeal than plaintiffs. This chapter draws these cases from the Alabama Jury Verdict reports, and reports from courts of appeals.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.