Research Handbook on Law and Courts
Show Less

Research Handbook on Law and Courts

Edited by Susan M. Sterett and Lee D. Walker

The Research Handbook on Law and Courts provides a systematic analysis of new work on courts as governing institutions. Authors consider how courts have taken on regulating fundamental categories of inclusion and exclusion, including citizenship rights. Courts’ centrality to governance is addressed in sections on judicial processes, sub-national courts, and political accountability, all analyzed in multiple legal/political systems. Other chapters turn to analyzing the worldwide push for diversity in staffing courts. Finally, the digitization of records changes both court processes and studying courts. Authors included in the Handbook discuss theoretical, empirical and methodological approaches to studying courts as governing institutions. They also identify promising areas of future research.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 25: Conflicts in indigenous law: courts and federalism in the United States and common law nations

Rebecca A. Reid and Todd A. Curry


This chapter offers an overview of the complex and evolving relationship between common law nations and indigenous First Nations, who are neither fully integrated into the dominant social and political institutions nor entirely separate as sovereign political entities. We examine how the United States Supreme Court enabled the devolution of federal obligations to First Nations, which then catalyzed increasing federal delegation of indigenous affairs to states to generate these conflicts. We find that this devolution directly undermines indigenous sovereignty and pushes indigenous rights to state courts, which tend to view Indigenous Peoples as interest groups and associations rather than sovereign Nations. This combination ensures that that indigenous rights are rarely secured either politically or via litigation. We compare these trends to two other common law, federalist democracies with British colonial history: Australia and Canada. Changes in federal policy and federalist delegation of indigenous affairs vary dramatically across these three nations despite their similar colonial histories and approaches to indigenous affairs. In the United States, indigenous policy authority shifted from the federal government to the states, while the opposite trend emerges in Australia, where states had initial authority over indigenous affairs, which increasingly shifted to the (federal) Commonwealth. Finally, indigenous affairs in Canada have largely stayed within the authority of the federal government since colonization. Hence, these three cases aid our evaluation of how shifts of indigenous policy across federalist institutions affect court roles and indigenous rights protections.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.