Handbook of Urban Segregation
Show Less

Handbook of Urban Segregation

Edited by Sako Musterd

The Handbook of Urban Segregation scrutinises key debates on spatial inequality in cities across the globe. It engages with multiple domains, including residential places, public spaces and the field of education. In addition it tackles crucial group-dimensions across race, class and culture as well as age groups, the urban rich, middle class, and gentrified households. This timely Handbook provides a key contribution to understanding what urban segregation is about, why it has developed, what its consequences are and how it is measured, conceptualised and framed.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Residential segregation of rural migrants in post-reform urban China

Zhigang Li and Feicui Gou

Abstract

This study examines the segregation of rural migrants in post-reform Chinese cities. We shed light upon the extent of segregation and investigate its dynamics and effects. Historically, the residential structure of socialist urban China was homogeneous, with few rural migrants in cities. After the so-called ‘open-door’ and market-oriented reforms beginning in the late 1970s, the socio-spatial landscapes of large Chinese cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou have been utterly transformed. Using the fifth (2000) and sixth (2010) Chinese national censuses, we measured the extent of residential segregation in Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen and identified areas of migrant segregation. The accumulation of rural migrants mainly appears in and near suburbs, forming a circular pattern around the city center. The determinants of this segregation include principally institutional forces such as household registration (hukou) status and property rights, as rural migrants often accumulate and are segregated, voluntarily or involuntarily, into so-called urban villages or worker enclaves. We found both positive and negative effects of this segregation: urban villages not only provide necessary affordable housing for rural migrants, but they also help migrants to construct social networks, accumulate social capital, and improve their residential satisfaction, psychological attachments and overall well-being. We show that urban villages are by no means truly segregated, and that the segregation of rural migrants can be transient. In contrast, worker enclaves, though formally managed and organized, are in fact gated camps, detached from the local society, bringing about psychological problems among rural migrants and potential social crisis.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.