Chapter 6: The ambiguity of statebuilding
Interventions and statebuilding are highly ambiguous endeavours. This chapter introduces ambiguity analysis which opens up new perspectives of non-competitive representations of intervention and statebuilding practice. It allows giving credit to the multiple truths at work in politics revolving around statehood, violence, legal governance, and notions of progress. Progress and rationality, it is argued, have lowered tolerance for ambiguity in politics and social life just as much as in academic enquiry. Systematically researching ambiguity, however, is not arguing for sloppy conceptualisation. Pointing out characteristics of ambiguities in interventions and statebuilding, new avenues for research can be explored; the chapter demonstrates how the state, but also military and bureaucratic interventions contribute to conflict dynamics in their move to disambiguate social life.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.