This chapter interrogates at the issue time and international intervention. Specifically, it makes the case that time is an imaginary that is socially constructed by actors with the power to do so. The chapter considers the construction and framing of 'crises' and how the framing of urgency and necessity is often used to justify intervention and the role of intervening parties. Just as empowered actors can designate what constitutes a crisis, they also seek to identify suitable timeframes for an exit from the intervention site. The chapter is sceptical of the notion of exit, however, and argues that the complex nature of international intervention, and its socio-economic and political implications for both the intervener and the intervened, means that there can be no definitive terminal moment of exit.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.