The South China Sea Arbitration
Show Less

The South China Sea Arbitration

The Legal Dimension

Edited by S. Jayakumar, Tommy Koh, Robert Beckman, Tara Davenport and Hao D. Phan

Bringing together leading experts on the law of the sea, this book provides a detailed analysis of the significant aspects, findings and legal reasoning in the high-profile case of the South China Sea Arbitration between the Philippines and China. It examines major issues discussed in the Arbitration including jurisdiction, procedure, maritime entitlement, and the protection of the marine environment. It also explores the implications of the case for the South China Sea disputes and dispute settlement under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Procedural issues arising from China’s non-participation in the South China Sea Arbitration

Tara Davenport

Abstract

Unlike domestic law, non-participation does not constitute a bar to international proceedings, and nor does it mean a default judgment will be automatically issued against a non-participating party. However, the procedural rules of many international courts and tribunals require a court or tribunal to ‘satisfy itself not only that it has jurisdiction but that the claim is well founded in fact and law’. This obligation poses unique challenges for an international court or tribunal seized of the dispute, requiring a delicate balancing act between the rights of the non-appearing state and the rights of the appearing state to ensure the proper administration of justice. In the South China Sea Arbitration initiated by the Philippines against China in 2013, China adopted a policy of non-appearance and non-participation from the beginning. The Arbitral Tribunal took a proactive approach in fulfilling its obligation to satisfy itself not only that it has jurisdiction but also that the claim is well founded in fact and law. This chapter will explore the validity of the Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal’s approach to China’s non-appearance in light of the procedural practices of other international courts and tribunals in state-to-state disputes and generally accepted principles of procedural fairness.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.