Edited by Alfredo De Massis and Nadine Kammerlander
Chapter 17: Why do so many qualitative studies of family businesses get rejected? Confessions of a recovering associate editor of the Family Business Review
Many qualitative studies of family businesses get rejected by reviewers. These rejections are often due to: (1) poorly framed research questions; (2) the contribution not being clear; (3) a poor description of the research methods; (4) data that is presented poorly; (5) a failure to differentiate between description and prescription; (6) trying to test rather than build theory; and (7) the inability to answer the ‘so what?’ question: why is this study important? This chapter gives examples of ‘good’ qualitative studies and suggestions for how to improve qualitative studies of family businesses.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.