Comparative Analysis and Critique
Edited by Helena Alviar García and Günter Frankenberg
Chapter 10: Plus ça change . . . the riddle of all Central Asian constitutions
Marx posed (and solved) the riddle of all constitutions when he argued that the advent of liberal democracy revealed the ‘actual people’ as the authors of political order. The Central Asian constitutions sharpen that riddle, because in common with post-Soviet constitutional systems generally, they reveal actual elites, governing networks, as authors. Evident in their serial amendment over the past 25 years (more adjustments than reforms), the Central Asian constitutions remain the instruments, albeit complex and contingent, of those informal networks, shifting but enduring associations of politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen organised on the basis of patron–client relations who divide the spoils of office and monopolise the exercise of public authority. Those same systems at the same time exhibit a distinctive mode of performance, of which plebiscitary affirmation (referenda) and outcome-orientated jurisprudence are indicative, in the context of international constitutionalist norms. Soviet in derivation, Central Asian network-cum-performative constitutionalism as a distinct species of the genus poses a radical challenge to the hegemony of liberal constitutionalism.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.