Authoritarian Constitutionalism
Show Less

Authoritarian Constitutionalism

Comparative Analysis and Critique

Edited by Helena Alviar García and Günter Frankenberg

The contributions to this book analyse and submit to critique authoritarian constitutionalism as an important phenomenon in its own right, not merely as a deviant of liberal constitutionalism. Accordingly, the fourteen studies cover a variety of authoritarian regimes from Hungary to Apartheid South Africa, from China to Venezuela; from Syria to Argentina, and discuss the renaissance of authoritarian agendas and movements, such as populism, Trumpism, nationalism and xenophobia. From different theoretical perspectives the authors elucidate how authoritarian power is constituted, exercised and transferred in the different configurations of popular participation, economic imperatives, and imaginary community.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 15: An authoritarization of Japanese constitutionalism?

Hajime Yamamoto


This chapter aims to study the phenomenon of authoritarization of contemporary Japanese politics under Shinzo Abe’s administration from 2012 to date, from a constitutionalist point of view. We think it is worth analysing the case of Japan because it allows us to consider whether Japan can be counted as a country which shows a movement towards becoming a ‘competitive authoritarian regime’ (David Landau), having been a liberal democracy. For this reason, the research interest is to identify how this authoritarization of Japanese constitutionalism has developed, and to what extent, under the current Abe administration. Enjoying a vast majority of seats in both Houses of the Parliament under a parliamentary cabinet system in the Westminster model, the coalition of his Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito, a right of centre Buddhist party has succeeded in trying to change the functions of the current governmental systems in a manner that largely makes them more authoritarian than was previously the case. Most interestingly, the Japanese political and legal systems operate within the bounds of their own constitutional frameworks despite public opinion being harshly critical of them. A good example is the very controversial military legislation adopted in September 2015 concerning activities of the Self-Defense Forces. Furthermore, it is important to examine a constitutional amendment draft published in 2012 and Abe’s personal concrete idea of constitutional amendment from the perspective of authoritarization of constitutionalism.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.