Edited by Giuseppe Eusepi and Richard E. Wagner
Chapter 4: Debt default and the limits of the contractual imagination: Pareto and Mosca meet Buchanan
Personal debts are obligations that people establish through agreement among one another, so it is easy to understand the general objection to defaulting on personal debts. Can such objections be reasonably extended to public debts within democratic regimes? Much depends on how reasonable it is to characterize democracy as a genuine system of self-governance, as against being a system where relationships of domination and subordination are masked by ideological claims on behalf of self-governance. Democratic governance always rests with a subset of the population. To be sure, it is conceivable, though not necessary, that governance could nonetheless proceed in a generally consensual fashion. Debt default is always a latent possibility that depends on momentary patterns of political coalition.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.