Edited by Kyle Bruce
Chapter 14: Contextualizing the historian: an ANTi-History perspective
This chapter asks who is the management historian? The question is timely because many management and organization studies researchers now do history, but they are doing it without conventional history training. This begs the question: are they licensed to write history and can they legitimately translate the past into history? In this chapter, the authors suggest de-privileging the historian as the sole arbiter of history to instead see her as an actor-network. Implying that the historian is an actor-network reminds us to consider the (human, non-human and non-corporeal) actors in her surroundings that have helped shape her formative professional development. To the extent that the historian is an outcome of, and stands on behalf of, her historical context, asking who she is necessitates an engagement with the notion of context. The chapter discusses the modernist historian and her context, followed by the postmodernist historian and her contexts. Finally, the authors draw on actor-network theory to flesh out who is the (amodernist) ANTi-Historian.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.