Global Private International Law
Show Less

Global Private International Law

Adjudication without Frontiers

Edited by Horatia Muir Watt, Lucia Bíziková, Agatha Brandão de Oliveira and Diego P. Fernandez Arroyo

Providing a unique and clearly structured tool, this book presents an authoritative collection of carefully selected global case studies. Some of these are considered global due to their internationally relevant subject matter, whilst others demonstrate the blurring of traditional legal categories in an age of accelerated cross-border movement. The study of the selected cases in their political, cultural, social and economic contexts sheds light on the contemporary transformation of law through its encounter with conflicting forms of normativity and the multiplication of potential fora.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Global market for sovereign debt: Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd.

Jérôme Sgard and Mark Weidemaier


The NML case points to an inversion of sovereignty, when debt makes purportedly sovereign actors dependent upon their access to global capital markets. NML Capital, Ltd. (NML), a vulture fund specialised in distressed sovereign debt, purchased at extreme discounts Argentine public bonds off a panicking market. In 2001, the Republic of Argentina defaulted on $103 billion of debt due to a severe economic crisis. The government announced that it would not pay its debts, but gave the investors a choice of accepting new bonds worth 70 per cent less. NML Capital did not accept and commenced a collective action against Argentina in Manhattan Federal District Court. The District Court decided in favour of NML, ordering Argentina to pay over US$2 billion to the vulture fund and to prioritise NML Capital’s position over other creditors. In order to execute the judgment against Argentina, NML served subpoenas on Bank of America and Banco de la Naci—n Argentina, requesting information about Argentina’s assets held worldwide. Argentina moved to quash the subpoenas and argued, under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), that the locations of its assets were immune from discovery. Nevertheless, the District Court ordered the banks to comply with the subpoena requests. Argentina appealed and the Second Circuit affirmed the discovery order, since it was directed at commercial entities that did not have a claim to sovereign immunity. Argentina then petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States, and the petition was granted.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.