Sustainable and Efficient Transport
Show Less

Sustainable and Efficient Transport

Incentives for Promoting a Green Transport Market

Edited by Ellen Eftestøl-Wilhelmsson, Suvi Sankari and Anu Bask

The EU Commission has set the goal of facilitating a competitive transport system, increasing mobility and supporting growth while simultaneously reaching a target of 60 per cent emissions reductions by 2050. In light of past performance and estimated development, the target will not be reached without further behavioural change in the transport sector. This interdisciplinary book examines how such a behavioural shift can be achieved by various organizational and legal means, focusing primarily on the European Union and its specific policies related to greening transport.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: Who pays for oil pollution at sea? Some remarks on the interplay between certainty of the law and unpredictability

Andrea La Mattina

Abstract

No ‘sustainable and efficient’ transport may exist without providing a system of liability of the transport operators which properly compensate damages for pollution generated by their activity. The case of oil pollution at sea is paradigmatic in order to understand the issues arising from the present regulation of this phenomenon and in particular the problems connected to the position of different kind of operators. In this perspective the Erika case has given rise to several decisions issued by the French criminal courts and the Court of Justice of the European Community. If the decision of the Court of Justice may be read as a fundamental statement on the coexistence between the international system of liability for oil pollution at sea and the European Directive on waste, the decisions of the French criminal courts have been a sort of ‘contradictory discussion’ over the fundamental principles of liability for oil pollution at sea, especially with regard to the ‘canalization’ of responsibility on the shipowner and its limits. The analysis of the decisions on the Erika case demonstrates that a fundamental question like ‘Who pays for oil pollution at sea?’ may receive unpredictable answers.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.