Edited by Satish Nambisan, Kalle Lyytinen and Youngjin Yoo
Measurements of change in employment and/or job quality are problematic. This chapter uses logic, historical and contemporary analysis to forecast little change in net job availability or quality due to digital innovation. Over the long run, digital innovation is more likely to be correlated with net job increase. Forecasts to the contrary interfere with prudent planning and needlessly raise anxiety. Economic, social, and environmental change can, in combination with digital innovation, affect job numbers. By itself digital innovation is unlikely to disequilibrate labor markets. There is similarly no evidence that digital innovation systematically lowers job quality. Thus far digital innovation has taken humans out of dangerous or unpleasant jobs. One can argue that digital innovation has improved job quality. Planning should be devoted to disequilibrium caused by multiple factors including digital innovation. For example, a pandemic below a tipping point of social unrest might push over to social unrest if labor markets are temporarily disrupted by digital innovation.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.