Edited by Nora Götzmann
Chapter 19: The need for a multidisciplinary HRIA team: Learning and collaboration across fields of impact assessment
Human rights impact assessment (HRIA) is inherently a multidisciplinary practice, as human rights are cross-cutting and implicate cultural, social, economic, political, legal, environmental and health topics. Yet, HRIA and related fields of impact and risk assessment largely reside in silos. A growing body of literature documents the added value of merging disciplinary methods and findings in pursuit of comprehensive analysis of the impacts of business activities on people and the environment. This chapter examines that literature as pertinent to HRIA, identifying space for HRIA practitioners to integrate the methodologies, good practices and experiences across impact assessment disciplines. The literature also indicates that other fields of impact assessment would benefit from incorporating human-rights-based approaches. The chapter makes the case for transdisciplinary collaboration and concludes with a set of concrete action items for HRIA practitioners to more fully integrate HRIA and established impact and risk assessment methodologies.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.