Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases
Show Less

Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases

A Principled Approach

Edited by Tina Søreide and Abiola Makinwa

This thought-provoking book examines the scope, benefits and challenges of negotiated settlements as an enforcement mechanism in bribery cases, and demonstrates the need for a more harmonized and principled approach to deterring corporate bribery. Written by a global team of experts with backgrounds in legal practice, policy work and academia, it offers a truly international perspective, considering negotiated settlements in view of a variety of different legal systems and traditions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Prosecutors discretionary authority in efficient law enforcement systems

Tina Søreide and Kasper Vagle


Prosecutors cannot end corporate bribery cases with a negotiated settlement unless they have the discretionary authority to do so, and this authority varies across countries. For this chapter, we developed a measure of prosecutorial discretion that allows for cross-country comparison and used this measure to study relationships between the freedoms granted to the prosecutor and countries’ notions of criminal law efficiency, as well as their political and economic context. For alleged offenders, freedom for prosecutors to settle bribery cases does not appear to signify an easy way out of the law enforcement situation. Jurisdictions that use settlements will often experience a lower extent of corruption and higher trust in their court systems. Settlement-friendly jurisdictions are not associated with lower budget for law enforcement, even if the use of settlements tends to reduce enforcement expenses per case. While there are few clear trends with respect to governance, strict constraints on the prosecutor are associated with undemocratic (authoritarian) regimes. More democracy means more freedoms for the prosecutor, yet several of the jurisdictions most associated with criminal justice values, legitimacy and democracy have introduced new principles that constrain prosecutors’ freedoms when they offer settlements.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.