Comparative Privacy and Defamation
Show Less

Comparative Privacy and Defamation

Edited by András Koltay and Paul Wragg

Providing comparative analysis that examines both Western and non-Western legal systems, this wide-ranging Handbook expands and enriches the existing privacy and defamation law literature and addresses the fundamental issues facing today’s scholars and practitioners. Comparative Privacy and Defamation provides insightful commentary on issues of theory and doctrine, including the challenges of General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and the impact of new technologies on the law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 25: Defamation and privacy law in Japan – from a comparative perspective

Jun Shimizu


This chapter examines defamation and privacy law in Japan and compares it mainly to the law of the United States (US). The chapter discusses each element of Japanese defamation law in detail and concludes that Japanese law has given stronger protection to reputation and has been harsher on freedom of expression than its US equivalent. For instance, Japanese courts allow public officials to recover damages in defamation suits, which is virtually impossible in the US. The basic structure of privacy protection in Japanese law is similar to the US, but when privacy conflicts with freedom of expression, Japanese courts tend to protect privacy more rigorously than in the US. The author also details problems concerning a recent development of the new media, including online intermediaries’ liabilities and the right to erasure in Japanese law. The Japanese statute grants narrower immunity to intermediaries than the US equivalent. Although there is no explicit reference to the right to erasure in Japanese codes or statutes, the Supreme Court of Japan held that an injunction to delete a search result is available when the interest of privacy apparently outweighs the interest of free expression. In this respect, Japanese law takes a similar position to European law, under which the courts sometimes held that online private information shall be deleted.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.