Structural Reforms for Growth and Cohesion
Show Less

Structural Reforms for Growth and Cohesion

Lessons and Challenges for CESEE Countries and a Modern Europe

Edited by Ewald Nowotny, Doris Ritzberger-Grünwald and Helene Schuberth

Effective and well-designed structural reforms are key to shaping Europe’s future in the context of the formidable challenges facing the continent today. This book examines the achievements and failures of past structural policies so that future ones can be adapted to address remaining and newly emerging challenges with greater success. Highlighting the social aspects and distributional effects of reforms that go beyond liberalization and deregulation, the book covers key issues facing future Europe, particularly those arising from technological innovation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Structural reforms and income distribution: an empirical analysis

Orsetta Causa

Abstract

In a majority of advanced countries, gross domestic product (GDP) growth since the mid-1980s has been associated with growing income disparities. To shed some light on the potential sources of trade-offs between growth and equity, this chapter investigates the long-run impact of structural reforms on household incomes across the distribution, and hence on income inequality. The chapter considers the sources of macroeconomic growth by decomposing growth in GDP per capita into growth in labour utilization and labour productivity. This allows shedding light on the mechanisms through which growth and its drivers, including policy drivers, benefit household incomes at different points of the income distribution. Most structural reforms are found to have little impact on income inequality when this is assessed through measures that emphasize the middle class. By contrast, a higher number of structural reforms, in particular social protection and labour market reforms, are found to have an impact on income inequality and thus may raise trade-offs and synergies between growth equity objectives when inequality is assessed through measures that put relatively more emphasis on incomes among the poor. This corresponds to higher inequality aversion.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.