Ideal and Normative Dimensions
Edited by Massimo La Torre, Leone Niglia and Mart Susi
Chapter 9: Human rights are not universal and cannot be natural
Differences between various theories of human rights so far have been mainly differences within the same Western worldview, which has either ignored other worldviews or treated them with condescension. To avoid abstract theorizing on the nature of human rights without studying concrete societies, which had previously existed or exist today, without the analysis of why some of them had become slave-owning societies while others had evolved into liberal democracies, it is necessary to take historical and comparative approaches. Both human rights, expressing the good that exists in humans, and human wrongs, reflecting the evil existing in the world and in us, are both equally human, though not necessarily humane. Human rights are social constructs that are called upon to respond to human needs and remedy human wrongs. Historically the emergence of human rights is related to the advent of centralized states in Medieval Europe where those belonging to the class of nobles needed tools that would have justified their claims against the king becoming all-powerful.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.