Towards a New Leadership in Global Investment Governance?
Edited by Julien Chaisse
Chapter 13: How much of a court? The EU Investment Court System as a hybrid mechanism
The concept of establishing a permanent adjudicatory body for investor-state disputes has become very close to political fulfilment. The European Commission has endorsed introduction of a permanent, court-like mechanism for investment disputes in several Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). A two-tier Investment Court System (ICS) has been accepted in the European Union’s (EU) FTA with Vietnam and in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the EU. This widely publicized EU ICS project has been presented as a court, to be further promoted in forthcoming EU FTA negotiations, and multilateralized in the future. It has also been introduced to the general public in opposition to the existing ISDS regime and as an original response to its shortcomings. This chapter examines, to what extent such a characterization of the ICS is justified. For this purpose, historical context of investor-state dispute resolution is explored. In particular, former proposals of establishment of a permanent adjudicatory body in this area are examined. Against this background, public discourse on ICS is analysed in order to present the goals of the project and its aimed directions of development.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.