Edited by Ben Saul
Despite the absolute international legal prohibition on torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, torture became more prevalent as a counter-terrorism instrument after the terrorist attacks on the United States of 11 September 2001. This chapter examines two key developments. First, the position taken by the US that aggressive or ‘enhanced’ interrogation techniques did not amount to torture or ill-treatment, despite clear international legal authority to the contrary. Second, the conduct of some state personnel in excess of their legal authority in interrogating or detaining suspects, even where it was accepted that torture was prohibited. This chapter explores these developments, as well as domestic, regional and international legal efforts to secure criminal or civil accountability for torture during this time.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.