Edited by Ben Saul
Chapter 26: Terrorism prosecutions and the right to a fair trial
Unlike the US ‘war on terror’, most other jurisdictions have followed a policy of prosecution primacy. Whilst this criminal justice approach is welcomed as securing several ethical gains, criminal prosecutions are susceptible to manipulation of counter-terrorism crimes and processes. As for the formulation of crimes, there arise special precursor offences, reflecting precautionary demands for intervention against bad thoughts not yet reflected in bad deeds. The pressures on process include reduced opportunities to challenge and evidential manipulation. The first part of this chapter will explain and assess the persistence of the criminal justice paradigm. The second part will probe the extent to which terrorism prosecutions can remain true to due process standards. The third part will reflect upon implications to date and future trends.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.