Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development
Show Less

Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development

Finance, Stakeholder Alignment, Governance

Edited by Raymond E. Levitt, W. R. Scott and Michael J. Garvin

Large infrastructure projects often face significant cost overruns and stakeholder fragmentation. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) allow governments to procure long-term infrastructure services from private providers, rather than developing, financing, and managing infrastructure assets themselves. Aligning public and private interests and institutional logics for decades-long service contracts subject to shifting economic and political contexts creates significant governance challenges. We integrate multiple theoretical perspectives with empirical evidence to examine how experiences from more mature PPP jurisdictions can help improve PPP governance approaches worldwide.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: The role of institutional investors in financing PPP infrastructure

Ashby H.B. Monk and Rajiv Sharma

Abstract

Institutional investors – pension funds, sovereign funds, endowments and family offices – control an enormous amount of investable capital. Estimates of their investment capacity range up to $100 trillion total, worldwide. Historically most of them have invested passively through funds managed by others, surrendering substantial fractions of the returns from these investments to the investment managers. Infrastructure, with its long-term, inflation-adjusted, moderate risk_return cash flows, represents an ideal kind of investment for these investors. However, infrastructure projects are all unique and involve multiple kinds of risks in each phase of their development, that require specialized skills to evaluate. A few large pensions and sovereigns have developed the internal capacity to evaluate, invest in and manage infrastructure projects, with returns offer exceeding 12 percent. The costs of developing this capacity represent a small fraction of the fees typically paid to investment managers. Other institutional investors can benefit from lessons learned by these pensions. Pension funds that are too small to justify doing this can band together and set up aligned investment managers owned by them to invest their syndicated capital.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.