Informed Consent and Health
Show Less

Informed Consent and Health

A Global Analysis

Edited by Thierry Vansweevelt and Nicola Glover-Thomas

Informed consent is the legal instrument that purports to protect an individual’s autonomy and defends against medical arbitrariness. This illuminating book investigates our evolving understanding of informed consent from a range of comparative and international perspectives, demonstrating the diversity of its interpretations around the world. Chapters offer a nuanced analysis of the problems that impede the understanding and implementation of the concept of informed consent and explore the contemporary challenges that continue to hinder both the patient and the medical community.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Informed consent: the Australian perspective

Ian Freckelton QC


In Australia, medical treatment cannot be provided without consent except in a number of narrow circumstances. However, Australian law has wrestled since the 1980s with what communications must take place to enable a patient’s consent to be sufficiently assisted by information; what conditions sufficiently impair capacity; and what the consequences should be when inadequate or misleading information is given to a patient. While Australia’s common law does not have a doctrine of ‘informed consent’, substantively and in popular legal parlance, the concept is alive and well. Consideration is given to the departure from the ‘Bolam test’ taken by the Australian appellate courts since the 1980s, and the likely direction of Australian jurisprudence and clinical practice. Scrutiny is also given to the definitions of ‘informed consent’ and ‘material risk’, and the status of informed consent is reviewed in mental health legislation, guardianship law and end-of-life decision making. While the direction of travel since the early 1990s has been a move away from health practitioner paternalism towards better-informed collaborative decision making by patients with assistance from their health practitioners, concerns remain that informed consent processes are too often formalistic, with patients being routinely ‘consented’. In Australia, as elsewhere, the challenge remains to operationalize the formal legal obligations in relation to the provision of information likely to be important to patients so that they are authentically at the centre of decision making about their own health.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.