The Conclusion and Implementation of EU Free Trade Agreements
Show Less

The Conclusion and Implementation of EU Free Trade Agreements

Constitutional Challenges

Edited by Isabelle Bosse-Platière and Cécile Rapoport

This timely book gives an overview of the main legal issues the EU faces in negotiating, concluding and implementing so-called ‘New Generation’ free trade agreements. Featuring contributions by international specialists on EU external action, this book demonstrates why these FTAs have become challenging for the EU, as well as analysing how the EU has dealt with its institutional constraints, and addresses contemporary debates and future challenges for EU institutions and Member States.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The Opinion on the free trade agreement with Singapore and its aftermath: some personal reflections

Fernando Castillo de la Torre

Abstract

While many of the ramifications of the European Court of Justice’s Opinion 2/15 have yet to be examined, the Opinion contains a number of issues which could potentially affect the conclusion of future free trade agreements (FTAs). First of all, in some crucial passages the Court proposed an evolutionary interpretation of the common commercial policy (CCP). The concept of ‘on an equal footing basis’ represents the crucial, modern idea which lies behind some passages of the Opinion, confirming that trade is no longer just about regulating customs and liberalization. Later judgments have also made a wide interpretation of trade-related aspects of intellectual property. The most controversial issues in the Opinion are found in the Court’s comments about portfolio investments and investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS). As of now, the future perspectives on this point are not clear, and one should expect some challenges in shaping FTAs post-Opinion 2/15. Major problems may arise in those areas which require approval from Member States, even if later judgments have clarified that lack of exclusive competence does not always mean that Member States have to be parties alongside the Union. There, the final decision will depend on the reaction of the Council and on those of the political actors involved in the negotiations and conclusion of such agreements.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.