The Conclusion and Implementation of EU Free Trade Agreements
Show Less

The Conclusion and Implementation of EU Free Trade Agreements

Constitutional Challenges

Edited by Isabelle Bosse-Platière and Cécile Rapoport

This timely book gives an overview of the main legal issues the EU faces in negotiating, concluding and implementing so-called ‘New Generation’ free trade agreements. Featuring contributions by international specialists on EU external action, this book demonstrates why these FTAs have become challenging for the EU, as well as analysing how the EU has dealt with its institutional constraints, and addresses contemporary debates and future challenges for EU institutions and Member States.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Like a bridge over troubled water: the 2/15 Opinion through the lens of EU loyalty

Federico Casolari


This chapter explores the role EU loyalty may play with regard to the free trade agreements (FTAs) of new generation concluded by the EU and its Member States as mixed agreements. In so doing, it uses the Singapore Opinion as a case study to illustrate the position taken by the Court of Justice thereon. In order to develop such an analysis, the chapter is structured as follows. After a brief introduction on the nature and the role of the principle of loyal cooperation within the EU legal order, the next section carries out a general assessment of its implementation in the EU external action. Section 3 analyses the implications in terms of EU loyalty emerging from the Singapore Opinion. This is followed in Section 4 by some general conclusions. The analysis suggests that the approach adopted by the Court in the Singapore Opinion is consistent with the maximalist attitude so far expressed by Luxembourg judges towards loyalty as far as mixed agreements are concerned. Such an approach is perfectly in line with the attempt of the Court to strengthen the autonomy of the EU legal order vis-à-vis the international law system, an attempt which is clearly visible in the ‘generous’ reconstruction of the EU exclusive competences under the envisaged EU-Singapore agreement, as well as in the solution offered to regulate the interplay between that agreement and the pre-existing bilateral investment treaties concluded by Member States with the third country. However, the chapter argues, also thanks to the analysis proposed by AG Sharpston in her opinion in Singapore, that a change of attitude by the Luxembourg judges is not only possible, it is also needed, in order to preserve the ‘full mutual’ nature of the loyalty principle, as well as the prerogatives that still characterize the Member States’ position within the EU legal order.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.