Show Less
You do not have access to this content

THE ROME III REGULATION

A Commentary on the Law Applicable to Divorce and Legal Separation

SABINE CORNELOUP

This comprehensive Commentary provides an in-depth, article-by-article analysis of the Rome III Regulation, the uniform rules adopted by the EU to determine the law applicable to cross-border divorce and legal separation. Written by a team of renowned experts, private international law scholars and practitioners alike will find this Commentary an incisive and useful point of reference.
Show Summary Details
This content is available to you

TABLE OF CASES

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

 

Babiarz v. Poland, App no.1955/10 ECHR 004 (10.01.2017) 12.11

Oliari v. Italy, App nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11 (21.07.2015) 1.08, 3.21

Orlandi v. Italy, App nos. 26431/12; 26742/12; 44057/12 and 60088/12 (14.12.2017) 1.08, 3.21

ZH & RH v. Switzerland App no 60119/12 (8.12.2015) 13.26

COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

 

Case 22/70 Commission v. Council [1971] ECR 263 0.21, 19.15

Case C-452/93 P Pedro Magdalena Fernandez v. Commission [1994] ECR I-4295, ECLI:EU:C: 1994:332 8.17, 8.19

Case C-90/97 Robin Swaddling v. Adjudication Officer [1999] ECR I-1075, ECLI:EU:C:1999:96 8.20

Case C-430/97, Jutta Johannes v. Hartmut Johannes [1999] ECR I -3475, ECLI:EU:C:1999:293 8.38

Case C-7/98, Krombach v. Bamberski [2000] ECR I-1935, ECLI:EU:C:2000:164 12.09

Case C-467/98 Commission v. Denmark [2002] ECR I-9519, ECLI:EU:C:2002:625 19.15

Case C-420/07, Apostolides v. Orams [2009] ECR I-3571, ECLI:EU:C:2009:271 12.09

Case C-523/07 Korkein hallinto-oikeus [2009] ECR I-02805 3.29, 5.29, 6.20

Case C-66/08 Proceedings concerning the execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Szymon Kozlowski [2008] ECR I-6041, ECLI:EU:C:2008:437 8.20

Case C-168/08 Hadadi v. Mesko [2009] ECR I-06871 3.31, 3.33, 8.36

Case C-533/08 TNT Express Nederland v. AXA Versicherung AG [2010] ECR I-4107, ECLI:EU:C:2010:243 19.15

Case C-497/10 Mercredi v. Chaffe [2010] ECR I-14309 3.29, 5.29

Case C-151/14 Commission v. Latvia ECLI:EU:C:2015:577 3.16

Case C-376/14 PPU C v. M EU:C:2014:2268 5.29

Case C-281/15 Sahyouni v. Mamisch ECLI:EU:C:2016:343 1.11–1.12, 1.15, 3.09, 3.12, 3.14, 3.16–3.17

Case C-372/16 Sahyouni v. Mamisch (Sahyouni II) ECLI:EU:C:2017:988 1.13–1.15, 5.42, 10.19, 10.28, 12.28

Case C-673/16 Coman v. Romania [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:385 0.25, 3.05, 3.21, 3.23, 13.38

Case C-111/17 PPU, OL v. PQ, EU:C:2017:436 5.29, 8.24

Case C-512/17, HR, EU:C:2018:513 5.29

Case C-149/18 da Silva Martins, ECLI:EU:C:2019:84 0.20, 2.07

Case C-393/18 PPU, UD v. XB, EU:C:2018:835 5.31

Case F-129/06 Rocio Salvador Roldan v Commission, [2007] FP-I-A-1-00265; FP-II-A-1-01491, ECLI:EU:F:2007:166 8.18

Case T-298/02 Anna Herrero Romeu v. Commission [2005] ECR II-4599, ECLI: EU:T:2005:369 8.22

Opinion 1/03 [2006] ECR I-1145, ECLI:EU:C:2006:81 0.21, 19.15

Opinion 1/13 [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:2303 19.15

Opinion 2/91 [1993] ECR I-1075, ECLI:EU:C:1991:490 19.15, 19.16

France

Bulkley v. Defresne, Cour de cassation [1860] Sirey 1860.1.210 0.01

Case 15/10288, Cour de cassation (24.02.2016) 8.24

Chemouni v. Chemouni, Cour de cassation 19 February 1963, (1963) Rev.crit. DIP., 559 13.19

Fairhurst v. Simitch, Cour de cassation [1985] Bulletin civil 1985, I, n° 55 0.01

Princesse de Bauffremont v. Prince de Bauffrement, Cour de cassation [1878], Sirey 1878.1.193 0.01

Riviere v. Roumiantzeff, Cour de cassation [1953] Bulletin civil 1953, I, n° 121; (1953) Rev.crit. DIP., 412 0.01, 13.20

United Kingdom

Beximco Pharmaceuticals v. Shamil Bank of Bahrain [2004] EWCA Civ 19 (CA) 11.25

Halpern v. Halpern [2007] EWCA Civ 291 (CA) 11.25

Jane Elizabeth Marinos v. Nikolaos Lykourgos Marino [2007] EWHC 2047 (Fam) 8.28

Munro v. Munro [2007] EWHC 3315 (Fam) 8.29

Sharab v. HRH Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal Bin Abdal-Aziz Al-Saud [2008] EWHC 1893 (Ch) 8.22

V v. V [2011] EWHC 1190 (Fam) 8.29