Bicameralism under Pressure
Edited by Richard Albert, Antonia Baraggia and Cristina Fasone
Chapter 4: How does the European Union challenge bicameralism? Lessons from the Italian case
This chapter investigates the main rationales and justifications of bicameralism, arguing that all modern bicameral systems are based, in their roots, on two possible ultimate justifications: the separation of powers and the protection of minorities. The chapter then explores the model of bicameralism adopted in the Italian Constitution of 1947. The analysis argues that the bicameral system of the Italian Republican Constitution is a formidable case study, as long as it is almost exclusively based on one single driver of bicameralism, namely the separation of powers. After analysing this model, the chapter explores the changing pattern of Italian bicameralism in light of the European integration process. European integration, a source of limitation of sovereignty, is considered as a key factor of the overcoming of the main justification of Italian bicameralism.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.