Law, Justices and Injustices
Edited by Tawhida Ahmed and Elaine Fahey
Chapter 4: The constitutional architecture of injustice
One of the many issues that the Brexit conjuncture raises is how does the Brexit vote and the broader processes around it intersect with and relate to justice. This chapter argues that the Brexit vote can be viewed as a reaction against forms of structural injustice which the EU systematically produces, and which it has enshrined into its core constitutional architecture. In short, the argument sketched here is that the actually existing EU, notwithstanding the highest ideals that animate many of its supporters, provides a constitutional framework which reproduces and legitimates stark injustices between and within the member states of the EU. That the Brexit vote was, in part, a rejection of this constitutional settlement, and in principle the Brexit rupture opens up space to pursue more expansive projects of justice in the UK and across Europe.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.