Edited by Marta Villar Ezcurra, Janet E. Milne, Hope Ashiabor and Mikael Skou Andersen
The adoption in 2015 of the Paris Agreement and the United Nations 2030 Agenda, with its Sustainable Development Goals, marked a turning point: policies for fossil fuel subsidies (FFSs) need to radically change. The G20 countries are contributing to this effort through peer reviews on FFSs: the peer review mechanism highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in this domain. FFSs cause excessive consumption of fossil fuels, exacerbate environmental pollution, result in lost government income and provoke serious health damages. Moreover, FFSs are inefficient from both an environmental and an economic point of view. They may be efficient on social grounds; but experience and analysis show that direct subsidies for poor and vulnerable groups are more efficient and avoid sending the wrong price signals to the market. This chapter describes the origins, process and results of the first G20 peer reviews (China-US; Mexico-Germany; and Indonesia-Italy).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.