Comparative Tort Law
Show Less

Comparative Tort Law

Global Perspectives

Edited by Mauro Bussani and Anthony J. Sebok

This revised second edition of Comparative Tort Law: Global Perspectives offers an updated and enriched framework for analysing and understanding the current state of tort law around the world. Using a critical comparative methodology, it covers not only the common tort law issues but also many jurisdictions often overlooked in the mainstream literature. Contributions explore illuminating case studies from tort systems in Europe, the US, Latin America, Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, including new chapters specifically discussing tort law in Brazil, India and Russia.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: The bounds between negligence and strict liability

Franz Werro and Erdem Büyüksagis


This chapter analyses the ways in which legislatures and courts have defined the foundations of tort liability. It shows that each legal system, embedded in its social, economic and cultural realities, tends to develop its own approach to liability, whether fault-based or strict. At times, laws appear to combine both types of liability and offer a third or a hybrid type of liability. Perhaps faithful to its 18th century revolutionary ideals, one fault-based model suggests that liability must rest solely on an objective lack of care, and hold defendants liable, regardless of their personal capacity. More interested in protecting defendants and free enterprise, another model favours defences, including that of the personal state of mind of defendants. The chapter also shows that for no-fault liability, laws offer a wide spectrum of solutions. In some jurisdictions, strict liability rests on a general norm in the hands of judges, where in others the legislature must have passed a special statute defining specifically the risk that triggers liability. Clearly, the choice is political, and it depends of how society views the means to cover the cost of accidents. Regardless of the type of liability, the availability of insurance mechanisms determines of course the reality and outcome of tort litigation. The chapter includes an appraisal of recent legislative reforms or academic proposals, and it concludes that further reflection is needed to evaluate the shortcomings of tort law as an individualistic means of dealing with certain harms.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.