Edited by Chiara Zilioli and Karl-Philipp Wojcik
Chapter 23: JUDICIAL CONTROL OF RESOLUTION PLANNING MEASURES
Legislators and regulators have placed much hope in the ability of resolution planning to ensure that banks can be resolved effectively and without undue collateral damage in case of their failure. To that end, EU law assigns far-reaching powers to resolution authorities and allows them to adopt measures that can be very costly for banks. This chapter explores the intricacies banks may face when seeking judicial control of resolution planning measures adopted under the SRM framework. It highlights the uncertainties surrounding jurisdiction, standing and the appealability of acts arising from the fact that resolution planning measures are the outcome of composite administrative procedures. In light of the technical complexities associated with the adoption of resolution planning measures, the chapter further argues that the standard applied by courts when reviewing such measures should be limited to manifest errors in assessment.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.