Edited by Jennifer H. Arlen
Chapter 4: Causation in tort law: A reconsideration
Causation is a source of confusion in tort theory, as well as a flash point for the debate between consequentialist and deontological legal theorists. Consequentialists argue that causation is generally determined by the policy grounds for negligence, not by a technical analysis of the facts. Conversely, deontologists reject the view that policy motives determine causation findings. Causation has also generated different approaches within the consequentialist school. Some take an essentially forward-looking approach to formalizing causation analysis, finding causation analysis to be subsumed within the Hand Formula. Another approach within the consequentialist school closely examines the incentive effects of causation in the presence of an uncertain application of the negligence test. This approach makes use of the fact that the causation test is applied retrospectively, but it makes no attempt to reconcile itself with the forward-looking approach.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.