Edited by Jennifer H. Arlen
Chapter 14: Bounded rationality in the settlement process: Empirical evidence on the causes of settlement failure in litigation
Trial outcomes are by definition inefficient: ex post, both parties would have preferred to settle voluntarily for the trial outcome rather than pay the additional costs incurred by litigating to a trial verdict. Research on the percentage of cases that settle without a trial outcome (the settlement rate) finds that while the majority of cases settle, a non-trivial number are resolved by trial (Heise 2013; Studdert et al. 2006; Eisenberg and Lanvers 2009; Galanter and Cahill 1994; Hadfield 2004; Clermont and Schwab 2009) indicating substantial inefficiencies in the current legal system. Inefficiencies and conflict attract researchers, and there are enormous literatures in the social and behavioral sciences that investigate why disputants cannot resolve their differences on their own.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.