Structural Changes and Subsidiarity in Italy and Britain
Edited by Alberto Brugnoli and Alessandro Colombo
Chapter 3: Governance and subsidiarity
In this chapter, I shall attempt to demonstrate for what reason and through which analytical route subsidiarity cannot be correctly seen merely as a contingent or auxiliary element of governance; rather, it must be understood and analysed as a fundamental characteristic of a governance capable of providing some of the answers that both scholars and practitioners of government have long (and with remarkably scant success) been seeking. To foreshadow the conclusion of my argument, this ultimately means that governance without subsidiarity is not genuine governance, and in particular it does not constitute ‘political’ governance. The origins, characteristics and main advantages of the concept of governance First, it would be appropriate to provide the reader with a number of clarifications of the phrase ‘political governance’. As a first approximation, the origins of this expression – and thus the analytical path to a satisfactory definition – can be located in the observed mutual contamination of social spaces which have traditionally been conceptualized as distinct and indeed often mutually opposed.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.