Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property
Show Less

Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property

A Handbook of Contemporary Research

Edited by Christophe Geiger

This wide-ranging Research Handbook is the first to offer a stimulating and systematic review of the framework for criminal enforcement of intellectual property rights. If counterfeiting constitutes an ever-growing international phenomenon with major economic and social repercussions, potentially affecting consumer safety and public health, the question of which are the appropriate instruments to enforce IP rights is a complex and sensitive one. Although criminal penalties can constitute strong and effective means of enforcement, serious doubts exist as to whether criminal sanctions are appropriate in every infringement situation. Drawing on legal, economic, historical and judicial perspectives, this book provides a differentiated sector-by-sector approach to the question of enforcement, and draws useful conclusions for future legislative initiatives at European, international and national levels.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Historical perspective on criminal enforcement

David Lefranc


It falls to us to inform the reader of the history of the penalties which ensure the protection of intellectual creation. Ideally, this study should be an account of comparative law. But the amplitude of the task would require long years of research and the collaboration of numerous authors. The present contribution is not a substitute for work of that scope. It adopts an essentially French point of view. In France, intellectual property in the modern sense of the term is the result of legislation enacted between 1791 and 1857. The contribution of the twentieth century is to have synthesized the laws. But the invention of the subject happened during the first half of the nineteenth century. It is at this time that treatises uniquely concerning intellectual property appeared. The system of privileges of the Ancien Régime does not constitute an intellectual property law in the strict sense of the term, even if there are several common points. It is possible to draw together privilege and property rights, considering that both give their benefi ciaries exclusive rights. Nevertheless these concepts are not equivalent. Contrefaçon (ie intellectual property infringement) is doubtless the only common factor between the two periods. It was punished before and after the French Révolution. As we shall see, its penal sanctions show remarkable continuity from the invention of printing until the end of the nineteenth century.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.